It delivers professional-level compositing tools at no cost and it can make your work smoother and more comfortable. A good solution is Natron, especially if you are on a budget. Natron falls into that category of not amortizing (in terms of time) for me.When it comes to making it look like elements from different sources are part of the same image in a video, a professional compositing software is what you need, rather than your run-of-the-mill lightweight video editor. In my case, I am very curious, I like to learn new things, however, I also recognize when something needs a lot of learning time, I appreciate if I will amortize that time in some practical way. They (my wife and son) don’t need Natron for what they want to edit. My son also abandoned (as I did at the time) a commercial video editing software (prosumer) for Shotcut.įor his Youtube Channel, he is very pleased with the performance of Shotcut for his needs. We even sent the course organizers information about Shotcut and they were pleasantly surprised at how practical Shotcut is for use in schools. When she finished the tasks in that course module, I showed her Shotcut and she was immediately open to learning. She told me it was overwhelming and although I customized the entire interface to simplify it (so she could do the tasks imposed on her in that course) she was reluctant to use software that was so difficult for her. When my wife saw Kdenlive’s interface on her laptop she became allergic. In the video editing section the video editing software was Kdenlive (basically this is because in the Linux distribution that they use in schools, it comes installed by default) My wife hates the computer, but she is a kindergarten teacher and has to recycle her knowledge and reset her mind to prepare for distance learning.Ī few months ago, she took a government course in distance education tools and resources. This week, I will start giving my wife lessons about Shotcut (free of charge of course□ ). Shotcut is so easy to learn and use and above all to teach others that, in my case, it was the choice over other video editing software. I understand (and it’s a personal opinion) that the original publication and its intention was to provide information about complementary tools to Shotcut.įor me, they are two software (Shotcut and Natron) that have, for the most part, different user niche. But the first-time user may not know that without being told, and may get discouraged by simple problems. Therefore, a “limitation” in Shotcut doesn’t bother me because I can comp it with a different tool. Part of the reason I’ve invested so much in Shotcut is because I’m aware of the other FOSS tools for doing things that Shotcut can’t do. If seasoned FOSS users don’t know all the alternatives, it’s extra unlikely Adobe users will take the time to figure it out. We could say the Adobe users need to search for FOSS alternatives better, but consider the number of advanced Shotcut users in this thread that were surprised to learn that Natron existed. After all, if FOSS can’t produce the entire project, there’s little reason to switch from quality already-owned software to a FOSS alternative with perceived limitations. They might stick with Adobe because they didn’t know they could do After Effects tasks in Natron. If all they see is Shotcut as a Premiere alternative from a simple web search, but aren’t aware that the rest of the ecosystem exists, they might pass on Shotcut itself thinking that open source can’t do everything they need (like advanced compositing). Suppose a commercial Adobe user wants to dip their toe into the open source world. 2D, 3D, compositing, painting, etc, and that the tools play nice with each other. They want to know an entire ecosystem is there to support their project goals. My logic is that people who are serious about producing a project don’t look at just one piece of software individually. I could see a case for mentioning Natron, Gimp, Krita, Blender, etc on the Resources page as alternatives to commercial programs, and show them as a high-level feature equality matrix.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |